![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service
VI. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A PROPERTYAfter determining the theme and appropriate
time or chronological period with which a property is associated, the geographic
limits of the property's context must be established. Exceptional importance does
not necessarily mean national significance; rather, it is a measure of a property's
importance within the appropriate historic context, whether the geographic scale
of that context is local, State, or national. In other words, is the property
best understood within the framework of a community, a river valley, a region,
the State, or the Nation? In evaluating and justifying exceptional importance,
it is critical to identify the properties in a geographical context that portray
the same values or associations and determine those that best illustrate or represent
the historical, architectural, cultural, engineering, or archeological values
in question. The scope or level (local, State, or national) at which this evaluation
is made is directly related to the geographic level or "scale" of the
property's historic context. For example, properties whose importance relates
only to local mining activities need only be compared to others found in that
locality to determine their comparative value.
|
| National Register Home | Publications Home | Previous Page | Next Page |
