Interpretation for Archeologists   5. Personal and Professional Responsibilities   Distance Learning

Promoting Archeological Stewardship

Among interpreters' greatest professional and personal responsibilities is ensuring public support for the protection of irreplaceable archeological resources. Through interpretive and education programs archeologists and interpreters should develop strong public support and stewardship for increased protection of archeological resources nationwide. The goals of such public outreach in the parks are to:

  • Foster a feeling of ownership of and responsibility for our common heritage
  • Increase public understanding of archeology
  • Enhance public awareness of current problems involving archeological resources such as looting
  • Increase understanding of how the public's actions affect archeological resources, and
  • Increase public involvement in legitimate archeological activities.

Several successful park programs exist to meet these goals, such as Glen Canyon National Recreation Area's brochure, “House Rules for Visiting Archeological Sites,” and their Cultural Site Steward Program. Arizona's award-winning Public Archaeology Program is an example of a successful effort to win the public's interest, support, and participation in preserving our archeological heritage at the state level.

Case Study

House Rules for Visiting Archeological Sites
At this web site find Glen Canyon National Recreation Area's creative solution to educating visitors about the proper treatment of archeological sites.

(photo) Three children participating in archeological work.

Young visitors learn to care about archeology by doing it. (Cuyahoga Valley NP, MWAC)

Providing opportunities for appropriate public enjoyment is an important part of a park's mission. National Park Service Management Policies make it clear that the Service encourages visitor activities that can be sustained without causing unacceptable impacts to park resources or values. However, the NPS won't allow activities that impair those resources. In some cases, this may mean that some archeological sites, for example, may be placed off-limits to visitation in order to protect them. Such restrictions present an interpretative opportunity to explain reasons for the restrictions to visitors and to the public. The message of stewardship and long-term preservation of important places can be imparted where off-site interpretations are the only option. In such cases, classroom or virtual visits may provide excellent alternatives for communicating the value of endangered sites.

In some cases, the location, or other information, about archeological sites may be kept confidential and not shared with visitors or the public. There is legal support in both the National Historic Preservation Act and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act for restricting information about archeological sites if releasing that information would cause a significant invasion of privacy; risk harm to the resource; or impede the use of a traditional religious site by practitioners.

For Your Information

Cultural Resources Management
The CRM chapter of the Archeology for Interpreters online guide outlines the role of the profession.

Caring for Sites
Archeological stewardship refers to a preservation movement that focuses on protecting and maintaining archeological sites for future generations.

Protecting the Past
This online book presents some of the current thinking and ongoing work in the field of archeological resource protection.

Arizona Archaeology Week: Promoting the Past to the Public
This Technical Brief describes how Arizona's innovative Archaeology Week program was developed.

Use What You Know: Assess Your Knowledge (#6 of 10)

(icon) A ranger's hat.
  • Choose a controversial topic at your park that the archeological perspective may enhance.
  • Use the interpretive equation and the interpretive process model to outline a strategy.
  • List audiences, multiple perspectives, multiple resources, and possible approaches.
  • Imagine the responses and write out answers to visitors who challenge the approach of multiple perspectives on controversial material.

MJB/EJL